Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2018-09-29 22:20:56
Message-ID: CA+q6zcVq6uvfmk657frfs4XFRO+nuSwEyjvXNScZ+0SH95XJMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 23:32, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 at 16:44, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 22 March 2018 at 23:25, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is the updated version of patch, rebased after recent conflicts and with
> > > suggested documentation improvements.
> >
> > Another rebased version of the patch.
>
> I've noticed, that I never updated llvmjit code for the arrayref expressions,
> and it's important to do so, since the patch introduces another layer of
> flexibility. Hence here is the new version.

Here is another rebased version, and a bit of history: the first prototypes of
this patch were sent more than 3 years ago. Of course the patch evolved
significantly over this period, and I take it as a good sign that it wasn't
rejected and keeps moving through the commitfests. At the same time the lack of
attention makes things a bit frustrating. I have an impression that it's sort
of regular situation and wonder if there are any ideas (besides the well known
advice of putting some efforts into review patches from other people, since I'm
already doing my best and enjoying this) how to make progress in such cases?

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-Base-implementation-of-subscripting-mechanism-v13.patch application/x-patch 62.2 KB
0003-Subscripting-for-array-v13.patch application/x-patch 13.5 KB
0005-Subscripting-documentation-v13.patch application/x-patch 19.6 KB
0004-Subscripting-for-jsonb-v13.patch application/x-patch 33.3 KB
0001-Renaming-for-new-subscripting-mechanism-v13.patch application/x-patch 54.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-09-29 22:25:37 Re: Cygwin linking rules
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2018-09-29 22:19:23 Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables