Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Date: 2017-03-30 17:18:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 March 2017 at 19:14, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I'm not sure that "typsbsparse" is better than "typsubscripting" or
"typsubparse". Maybe "typsubsparse"?

`typsubparse` is more confusing as for me, but I like `typsubsparse`.

> I've tried tests from message [1]. They looks good. Performance looks
similar for subscripting without patch and with patch.

Great, thank you for confirmation.

I've attached a new version of the patch with related improvements.

Attachment Content-Type Size
generic_type_subscription_v10.patch text/x-patch 215.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-03-30 17:29:45 Re: Monitoring roles patch
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-30 17:16:53 Re: Logical decoding on standby