Re: WL_SOCKET_ACCEPT fairness on Windows

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WL_SOCKET_ACCEPT fairness on Windows
Date: 2023-09-08 06:59:33
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLsRzow_xJx=S8udjyz-jO_VPH4fYqbiCs0GA9bCDpruA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I committed this for 17. It would be good to come up with something
fundamentally better than this, to get rid of that 64 event limit
nonsense, but I don't see it happening in the 17 cycle, and prefer the
semantics with this commit in the meantime.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-09-08 07:04:24 Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-08 06:38:12 Re: Impact of checkpointer during pg_upgrade