Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
Date: 2021-06-12 10:36:41
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLah2w1pWKHonZP_+EQw69=q56AHYwCgEN8GDzsRG_Hgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:14 PM Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
>
> This commit changes WAL archiver process so that it's treated as
> an auxiliary process and can use shared memory. This is an infrastructure
> patch required for upcoming shared-memory based stats collector patch
> series. These patch series basically need any processes including archiver
> that can report the statistics to access to shared memory. Since this patch
> itself is useful to simplify the code and when users monitor the status of
> archiver, it's committed separately in advance.

I think this needs to handle ProcSignalBarrierPending. Otherwise,
code that tries to use proc signal barriers (like CF #2962 and #2602)
might hang forever when an archiver is running.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-06-12 12:44:15 pgsql: Fix new recovery test for use under msys
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-06-12 07:30:02 pgsql: Simplify some code in getObjectTypeDescription()