Re: WaitLatchOrSocket seems to not count to 4 right...

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WaitLatchOrSocket seems to not count to 4 right...
Date: 2022-02-10 21:47:45
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL82Th2BbmMsSFiO1TBR7Dd5uxSc_b3sAyTc-037czUHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:51 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> (and one day we should make it dynamic and change udata to hold
> an index instead of a pointer...)

Here's a patch like that.

I'd originally sketched this out for another project, but I don't
think I need it for that anymore. After this exchange I couldn't
resist fleshing it out for a commitfest, just on useability grounds.
Thoughts?

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Expand-WaitEventSet-dynamically.patch text/x-patch 17.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-10 22:01:52 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2022-02-10 21:47:15 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby