Re: Collation versioning

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Douglas Doole <dougdoole(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Date: 2020-07-10 00:15:44
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKyL0B9Yz4cBBh7Yi-2UQ6XLLGifB0zxrPc1qxuh-KTEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:13 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:00 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > In order not to derail this patch set I think it would be okay for now
> > to just include all index AMs in dependency tracking and invent a
> > mechanism later that excludes hash and bloom in an extensible manner.
>
> FTR I'll be happy to take care of that.

Ok, thanks! Let's go with that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-07-10 00:18:52 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-07-10 00:08:42 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk