| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A qsort template |
| Date: | 2021-07-22 07:30:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK0w6sKNRPx4bgS_+DSY5LxKTZnDqxCL5PmEo3tKGySgw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:20 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > The big problem in my mind, which would not be alleviated in the
> > slightest by having a separate file, is that it'd be easy to miss
> > removing entries if they ever become obsolete.
>
> I suppose you could invent some kind of declaration syntax in a
> comment near the use of the pseudo-typename in the source tree that is
> mechanically extracted.
What do you think about something like this?
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Teach-pgindent-about-special-file-local-typenames.txt | text/plain | 15.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2021-07-22 07:38:50 | Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates |
| Previous Message | Dipesh Pandit | 2021-07-22 07:16:07 | Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful |