Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Date: 2021-08-03 02:19:22
Message-ID: CA+hUKGK--es4iccyAcLrevOdz5Sns4u=nNXDG5nF_G3MaGPggg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 9:52 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:17 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
> > RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
> > not to further simplify as in the attached?
>
> LGTM.

And pushed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-08-03 02:36:12 Dividing line between before_shmem_exit and on_shmem_exit?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-08-03 02:14:39 Re: 2021-07 CF now in progress