| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel leader process info in EXPLAIN |
| Date: | 2019-11-03 23:29:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+KgUA6pmwifq-QJZgeJkYToTYK4nd=9sos6HEiQh5fxg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:11 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess I thought of that as a debugging feature and took it out
> because it was too verbose, but maybe it just needs to be controlled
> by the VERBOSE switch. Do you think we should put that back?
By which I mean: would you like to send a patch? :-)
Here is a new version of the "Leader:" patch, because cfbot told me
that gcc didn't like it as much as clang.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Show-parallel-leader-stats-in-EXPLAIN-output-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.3 KB |
| 0002-Improve-EXPLAIN-of-Sort-in-parallel-queries-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-04 00:35:25 | Re: Getting psql to redisplay command after \e |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-11-03 23:11:42 | Re: Parallel leader process info in EXPLAIN |