Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2020-04-08 21:55:25
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+AzDLtAo1R3kxLW0nKRYd9euiBhW92OW1OCjkRU2E1pQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:27 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 4/8/20 8:12 AM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Judging by the comments made in this thread and
> > elsewhere, I think the feature is in demand so I hope there is a way
> > we could get it into 13 in the next couple of days, but I totally
> > accept the release management team's prerogative on that.
>
> That's up to the RMT, of course, but we did already have an extra week.
> Might be best to just get this in at the beginning of the PG14 cycle.
> FWIW, I do think the feature is really valuable.
>
> Looks like you'll need to rebase, so I'll move this to the next CF in
> WoA state.

Thanks. Here's a rebase.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Add-pg_atomic_unlocked_add_fetch_XXX.patch text/x-patch 3.3 KB
v8-0002-Allow-XLogReadRecord-to-be-non-blocking.patch text/x-patch 14.5 KB
v8-0003-Prefetch-referenced-blocks-during-recovery.patch text/x-patch 60.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-04-08 22:06:23 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-04-08 21:37:55 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()