Re: Fix rescan costing of single-batch hash joins

From: Baji Shaik <baji(dot)pgdev(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Fix rescan costing of single-batch hash joins
Date: 2026-10-22 13:32:05
Message-ID: CA+fm-RM6SMTqs=DzWrVz2QPmGYHmnTNmJPPtxjugq4SNNhQq+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 6:47 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> I agree that this is for master-only as well. Could you add it to the
> upcoming commitfest. I'd like to review it next month.

Thank you for looking into this, Etsuro.
Added to the commitfest: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/7502/

Thanks,
Baji Shaik.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-10-22 13:34:05 Re: New test function replace_conf() to get rid of unlink/append pattern
Previous Message Amit Langote 2026-10-22 13:14:11 Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert