On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Revised patch attached. I think it would be useful to assert this
> both at process startup time and at process shutdown, since it would
> really be much nicer to have the process that didn't clean up fail the
> assertion, rather than the new one that innocently inherited its slot;
> so the attached patch takes that approach.
Something stronger than an assertion at shutdown? Run-time test?
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-10-31 20:22:45|
|Subject: Re: myProcLocks initialization |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-10-31 20:15:54|
|Subject: Optimizing GetRunningTransactionLocks()|