| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Chris Redekop <chris(at)replicon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load |
| Date: | 2011-10-27 09:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKx-N5Qmn6FwpvSoLhTqDp70U+tWJ59=t=--KUH3uhP7g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> This fixes both the subtrans and clog bugs in one patch.
>
>> I don't see the point of changing StartupCLOG() to be an empty
>> function and adding a new function TrimCLOG() that does everything
>> StartupCLOG() used to do.
>
> +1 ... I found that overly cute also.
It would have been even easier to move StartupCLOG() later, but then
we'd need a big comment explaining why CLOG starts up at one point and
subtrans starts up at another point, since that is very confusing way
of doing things. I wrote it that way first and it definitely looks
strange.
It's much easier to understand that StartupCLOG() is actually a no-op
and that we need to trim the clog at the end of recovery in all cases.
The patch isn't meant to be cute, just a better of way of expressing
what needs to be done, so I think the patch should stay that way.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-27 10:29:56 | Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-27 09:25:59 | Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog |