Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Faster compression, again

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Faster compression, again
Date: 2012-03-15 22:14:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> If we're curious how it affects replication
> traffic, I could probably gather statistics on LZO-compressed WAL
> traffic, of which we have a pretty huge amount captured.

What's the compression like for shorter chunks of data? Is it worth
considering using this for the libpq copy protocol and therefore
streaming replication also?

 Simon Riggs         
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-15 22:17:04
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-03-15 22:13:45
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group