Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Date: 2012-01-25 18:07:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> What happens if we shutdown the WALwriter and then issue SIGHUP?
>> SIGHUP doesn't affect full_page_writes in that case. Oh, you are concerned about
>> the case where smart shutdown kills walwriter but some backends are
>> still running?
>> Currently SIGHUP affects full_page_writes and running backends use the changed
>> new value of full_page_writes. But in the patch, SIGHUP doesn't affect...
>> To address the problem, we should either postpone the shutdown of walwriter
>> until all backends have gone away, or leave the update of full_page_writes to
>> checkpointer process instead of walwriter. Thought?
> checkpointer seems the correct place to me


 Simon Riggs         
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-25 18:07:31
Subject: Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-01-25 17:58:15
Subject: Re: GUC_REPORT for protocol tunables was: Re: Optimize binary serialization format of arrays with fixed size elements

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group