| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
| Date: | 2011-09-09 15:18:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nM+9RuUNEcgehyQZU9VzSLjTGPsK4yGuK8+MLxvd09nkUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I have to wonder though, if it wouldn't be less confusing to just get
>> rid of recovery.conf and use a *different* file for this. Just to make
>> it clear it's not a config file, but just a boolean exists/notexists
>> state.
>
> +1. If it's not a configuration file anymore, it shouldn't be called
> one.
+1 to rename file
+1 to overall concept, just thinking same myself, not looked at patch yet
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2011-09-09 15:30:02 | Re: Patch to improve reliability of postgresql on linux nfs |
| Previous Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2011-09-09 15:17:04 | Re: REVIEW proposal: a validator for configuration files |