| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |
| Date: | 2022-08-23 18:58:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobWFL5eU=60egYuzL0C0cgaVFEOVriTk_Rbs_cpj=MreQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:32 PM tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/28/22 8:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > No, it seems to me that's behaving as intended. REVOKE BLAH OPTION ...
> > is intended to be a way of switching an option off.
> Ok, Thanks, Robert. I tested with a couple of more scenarios like
> pg_upgrade/pg_dumpall /grant/revoke .. with admin option/inherit
> and things look good to me.
This patch needed to be rebased pretty extensively after commit
ce6b672e4455820a0348214be0da1a024c3f619f. Here is a new version.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v6-0001-Allow-grant-level-control-of-role-inheritance-beh.patch | application/octet-stream | 38.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-08-23 19:13:20 | Re: Move NON_EXEC_STATIC from c.h |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-23 18:30:14 | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |