| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers |
| Date: | 2011-11-29 15:10:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobSoW4guEEkB05=3A4yF50zPdZfGVTemgVc0+667wwcbg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm, just to prod this thread: has any fix for this been committed?
> After Nikhil confirmed that this bug could cause pg_dump to not be
> able to operate without direct catalog surgery I have encountered this
> bug (and treated its symptoms in the same manner) twice. I tried to
> do my homework in a backbranch, but am not seeing anything beaming out
> at me.
I have plans to try to improve this, but it's one of those things that
I care about more than the people who write the checks do, so it
hasn't quite gotten to the top of the priority list yet.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-29 15:13:28 | Re: odbc_fdw |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-11-29 15:01:49 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |