| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Huehner <stefan(at)huehner(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates) |
| Date: | 2016-05-06 19:06:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobPqrAVXOBMHTcpDq8hX7gCzcVhoUvC8s9V=d09+bt30w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5 May 2016 at 16:04, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've started making some improvements to this, but need to talk to
>> Tomas. It's currently in the middle of his night, but will try to
>> catch him in his morning to discuss this with him.
>
> Ok, so I spoke to Tomas about this briefly, and he's asked me to send
> in this patch. He didn't get time to look over it due to some other
> commitments he has today.
>
> I do personally feel that if the attached is not good enough, or not
> very close to good enough then probably the best course of action is
> to revert the whole thing.
Tom, what do you think about this patch? Is it good enough, or should
we revert the whole thing?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-05-06 19:07:51 | Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-06 18:52:30 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |