| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: some longer, larger pgbench tests with various performance-related patches |
| Date: | 2012-01-25 13:49:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobL32HgVNs98dzkve0FaqF3Jr4Y7RinRjv0CyJJJZkf2g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we should be working to commit XLogInsert and then Group
> Commit, then come back to the discussion.
I definitely agree that those two have way more promise than anything
else on the table. However, now that I understand how badly we're
getting screwed by checkpoints, I'm curious to do some more
investigation of what's going on there. I can't help thinking that in
these particular cases the full page writes may be a bigger issue than
the checkpoint itself. If that turns out to be the case it's not
likely to be something we're able to address for 9.2, but I'd like to
at least characterize it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-25 13:57:49 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add new replication mode synchronous_commit = 'write'. |
| Previous Message | Jim Mlodgenski | 2012-01-25 13:29:57 | Re: Client Messages |