| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Date: | 2020-10-22 14:06:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobGxdm8Tsxawt7LW-qigHRHxD+b17PC+ft9EE+6pMhC9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:51 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Committed. Let's see what the buildfarm thinks.
It is mostly happy, but thorntail is not:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=thorntail&dt=2020-10-22%2012%3A58%3A11
I thought that the problem might be related to the fact that thorntail
is using force_parallel_mode, but I tried that here and it did not
cause a failure. So my next guess is that it is related to the fact
that this is a sparc64 machine, but it's hard to tell, since none of
the other sparc64 critters have run yet. In any case I don't know why
that would cause a failure. The messages in the log aren't very
illuminating, unfortunately. :-(
Mark, any ideas what might cause specifically that set of tests to fail?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Brusselback | 2020-10-22 14:07:29 | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-10-22 13:49:14 | Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c |