Re: Creating foreign key on partitioned table is too slow

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "kato-sho(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kato-sho(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Creating foreign key on partitioned table is too slow
Date: 2019-11-15 13:30:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmobG8zdY+qPbz5393cT4bogiWZ9JPpwtfAQ4m0EKWDJShw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 4:46 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> But it is not totally
> unreasonable to have lots of partitions, and as we improve the system,
> more and more people will want to.

Yep.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-11-15 13:36:19 Re: make pg_attribute_noreturn() work for msvc?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-11-15 13:16:22 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.