Re: assessing parallel-safety

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: assessing parallel-safety
Date: 2015-09-16 19:42:07
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob97ax_6Y1qvMbJosmAHx9L-j8jV4WdXfnheSvkgxNLiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> I went ahead and completed this patch with respect to adding new clause
>> in CREATE/ALTER FUNCTION which can allow users to define the
>> parallel property for User defined functions.
>
> Attached, find the rebased patch which can be used to review/test latest
> version of parallel_seqscan patch which I am going to post in the parallel
> seq. scan thread soonish.

I've committed this with some modifications. There's lots of room for
improvement here, but this is a tolerable first cut.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-09-16 19:45:29 Re: pg_resetxlog sentences
Previous Message Robbie Harwood 2015-09-16 19:22:59 Re: [PATCH v2] GSSAPI encryption support