Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xlog location arithmetic

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic
Date: 2011-12-23 16:15:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Even if there are several, what exact advantage does a datatype offer
>>> over representing LSN values as numerics?  It seems to me to be adding
>>> complication and extra code (I/O converters at least) for very little
>>> gain.
>> I guess I'm just constitutionally averse to labeling things as "text"
>> when they really aren't.
> Er ... text?  I thought the proposal was to use numeric.

The proposal is to make a function that takes a text argument (which
is really an LSN, but we choose to represent it as text) and returns

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-12-23 16:35:43
Subject: Re: WIP: explain analyze with 'rows' but not timing
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-12-23 16:14:06
Subject: Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group