Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-12-20 20:56:00
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoar8+V1ycDPgT_-d+1pG_9uRn=qSPty2Y2PgNQBTqRsfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:11 AM Jakub Wartak
<jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> the v15 patchset (posted yesterday) test results are GOOD:

All right. I committed the main two patches, dropped the
for-testing-only patch, and added a simple test to the remaining
pg_walsummary patch. That needs more work, but here's what I have as
of now.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v17-0001-Add-new-pg_walsummary-tool.patch application/octet-stream 18.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Burroughs 2023-12-20 21:48:13 Re: libpq compression (part 3)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-12-20 20:49:37 Re: libpq compression (part 3)