Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Date: 2022-02-16 17:56:42
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoadjx+r8_gGbbnNifL6vEyjZntiQRPzyixrUihvtZ5jdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:51 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Good news!

+1. But I think we might want to try to write documentation around
this. We should explicitly tell people NOT to use single-user mode,
because that stupid message has been there for a long time and a lot
of people have probably internalized it by now. And we should also
tell them that they SHOULD check for prepared transactions, old
replication slots, etc.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2022-02-16 18:06:31 improve --with-lz4 install documentation
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-16 17:53:58 Re: initdb / bootstrap design