Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing faulty hyperLogLog merge function
Date: 2016-04-27 14:57:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaKqRF8U_4pKpMEXN62JxAE1v4k0M7eN0GZWPNau=syuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I haven't followed this issue all that closely, but to me it seems
>> pretty clear. If the function is brand new to 9.6, buggy, and not even
>> used anywhere, I cannot imagine why we would leave it in the tree.
>
> +1. We should definitely not encourage its use for 3rd-part plugins.

So, now there's clearly a consensus. Committed. :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-27 14:57:38 Re: pgindent
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-27 14:51:55 pgindent