On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
>> <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
>>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
>>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
>>> changes few lines of code.
>>> Any thoughts?
>> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?
> It's been like that all along, no?
Yeah, but it seems an awful lot like a bug. In fact... it's hard to
imagine how it could be any more of a bug than this.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Urbański||Date: 2012-07-03 15:45:14|
|Subject: Re: plpython issue with Win64 (PG 9.2)|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-07-03 15:43:14|
|Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch|