| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Network failure may prevent promotion |
| Date: | 2024-05-14 14:16:00 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZneP50v-dFe6U2Tcrdm2MPOMaiB=o3EVgbHQky53mpEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 2:32 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [ new patch set ]
Hi,
I think it would be helpful to make it more clear exactly what's going
on here. It looks 0001 is intended to revert
21ef4d4d897563adb2f7920ad53b734950f1e0a4, which was itself a revert of
728f86fec65537eade8d9e751961782ddb527934, and then I guess the
remaining patches are to fix up issues created by that commit, but the
commit messages aren't meaningful so it's hard to understand what is
being fixed.
I think it would also be useful to clarify whether this is imagined to
be for master only, or something to be back-patched. In addition to
mentioning that here, it would be good to add that information to the
target version field of https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4748/
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-14 14:38:31 | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-14 14:08:18 | Re: Dump-restore loosing 'attnotnull' bit for DEFERRABLE PRIMARY KEY column(s). |