Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion
Date: 2014-11-06 15:49:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZXkoSjy1cNWxzusj=dDim+L+zBNNXm6NV9qXRJPS9DGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, I think that's probably a net improvement in robustness quite
> apart from what we decide to do about any of the rest of this. I've
> attached it here as revise-procglobal-tracking.patch and will commit
> that bit if nobody objects. The remainder is reattached without
> change as group-locking-v0.1.patch.
>
> Per your other comment, I've developed the beginnings of a testing
> framework which I attached here as test_group_locking-v0.patch.

Urk. I attached a version with some stupid bugs. Here's a slightly better one.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
test_group_locking-v0.1.patch text/x-patch 31.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2014-11-06 17:12:36 Re: split builtins.h to quote.h
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-11-06 15:32:33 Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)