Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Date: 2011-08-31 16:32:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:18:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >
>> > OK, this was very helpful.  I found out that there is a bug in current
>> > 9.0.X, 9.1.X, and HEAD that I introduced recently when I excluded temp
>> > tables.  (The bug is not in any released version of pg_upgrade.)  The
>> > attached, applied patches should fix it for you.  I assume you are
>> > running 9.0.X, and not 9.0.4.
>> pg_upgrade worked. Now I'm doing reindex and later on vacuumdb -az.
>> will keep you posted.
> FYI, this pg_upgrade bug exists in PG 9.1RC1, but not in earlier betas.
> Users can either wait for 9.1 RC2 or Final, or use the patch I posted.
> The bug is not in 9.0.4 and will not be in 9.0.5.

Based on subsequent discussion on this thread, it sounds like
something is still broken.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2011-08-31 17:03:22
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-08-31 16:23:07
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: DonDate: 2011-08-31 16:52:19
Subject: Re: out of memory - no sort
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2011-08-31 16:29:17
Subject: Re: out of memory - no sort

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group