Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On lör, 2012-04-14 at 08:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> It has a lot of sense.  Without it, it's very difficult to do logical
>> >> replication on a table with no primary key.
>> >>
>> >> (Whether or not people should create such tables in the first place
>> >> is, of course, beside the point.)
>> >
>> > I am not against to functionality - I am against just to syntax DELETE
>> > FROM tab LIMIT x
>> >
>> > because is it ambiguous what means: DELETE FROM tab RETURNING * LIMIT x
>>
>> What's ambiguous about that?
>
> I suppose one could wonder whether the LIMIT applies to the deleting or
> just the returning.

I suppose. I had in mind it would apply to both.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company