| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function to track shmem reinit time |
| Date: | 2018-04-10 17:57:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ3gk=mnKMi2SnpuO7SG7oaSXdDZjoeCiqZhuqDdF9NVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:07 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 3/29/18 9:40 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 03/28/2018 08:55 PM, David Steele wrote:
>>> I'm setting this entry to Waiting on Author, but based on the discussion
>>> I think it should be Returned with Feedback.
>>
>> Fine with me.
>
> This entry has been marked Returned with Feedback.
I guess I'm in the minority here, but I don't see why it isn't useful
to have something like this. It's a lot easier for a monitoring
process to poll for this kind of thing than it is to monitor the logs.
Not that log monitoring isn't a good idea, but this is pretty
lightweight.
OTOH, it also seems like this could live as an out-of-core extension,
so I guess if nobody else likes the idea Anastasia could always do it
that way.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-04-10 18:01:34 | Re: Boolean partitions syntax |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-10 17:56:37 | Re: submake-errcodes |