| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Connection slots reserved for replication |
| Date: | 2019-01-15 20:21:18 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ0jOYMg7KVBQuj2DbJuujbEbysY13zFSo7PVGbYX3X6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 6:36 AM Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was also thinking about changing the value in PG_CONTROL_VERSION,
> because we added the new field into the control file, but decided to
> leave this change to committer.
We typically omit catversion bumps from submitted patches to avoid
unnecessary conflicts, but I think PG_CONTROL_VERSION doesn't change
enough to cause a problem. Also, it's not date-dependent the way
catversion is. So I would include the bump in the patch, if it were
me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-01-15 20:24:44 | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-01-15 19:50:07 | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |