| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged relation copy is not fsync'd |
| Date: | 2024-01-05 19:40:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYxtORZEUwM=GzZXPogaNCi0dvYPndJMoPkd5spJQXLtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 7:47 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, I think this is still not 100% correct,
> even with the patch I posted earlier:
This is marked as needing review, but that doesn't appear to be
correct, because there's this comment, indicating that the patch
requires re-work, and there's also two emails from Noah on the thread
providing further feedback. So it seems this has been waiting for
Heikki or someone else to have time to work it for the last 3 months.
Hence, marking RwF for now; if someone gets back to it, please reopen.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-01-05 19:47:09 | Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-01-05 19:35:23 | Re: Should the archiver process always make sure that the timeline history files exist in the archive? |