Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Date: 2021-08-02 13:17:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYxi_f14WW6osP61DYQinrVQLyFX1F38NZWHW9xJJmgNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:37 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I pushed 0001.

That's great. I just realized that this leaves us with identical
RequestCheckpoint() calls in two nearby places. Is there any reason
not to further simplify as in the attached?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Further-simplify-a-bit-of-logic-in-StartupXLOG.patch application/octet-stream 2.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2021-08-02 13:40:20 Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-08-02 13:07:18 Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery