| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache |
| Date: | 2011-09-27 12:38:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYT-r7sjEen7N6Awo60qB6QWUCoR7xKwV4bBn1APywMYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've committed this, but I still think it would be helpful to revise
>> that comment. The turn "boosted up" is not very precise or
>> informative. Could you submit a separate, comment-only patch to
>> improve this?
>>
> I tried to put more detailed explanation about the logic of do { ... } while
> loop of sepgsql_avc_check_valid and the cache field of new security label to
> be switched on execution of the procedure. Is it helpful?
I edited this and committed it along with a bunch of further
wordsmithing on the comments in that file. Please let me know if you
see any isuses.
Thanks,
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitor Reus | 2011-09-27 12:56:25 | Re: CUDA Sorting |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-09-27 12:24:47 | Re: heap_update temporary release of buffer lock |