| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? | 
| Date: | 2012-04-25 18:59:00 | 
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYQFcDdYx-6mmZQQqCukKyGw+rd3nPZ-FU9ccHf5OJh7g@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and
>> catching up on old stuff has delayed that.  I will start working on them
>> now and have them ready before we start beta.  If that is a problem,
>> please let me know.
>
> Well, we aren't ready for beta today anyway, AFAICT.
>
> Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week?
> (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow the usual
> type of release schedule.)
I suspect that's a bit aggressive.  We have a couple of issues that I
think we should fix before beta1:
- the pg_stat_statements cleanups we were discussing on the other
thread, since that's going to involve changing column names/types
- the Hot Standby vs. index-only scans stuff, which needs a WAL format
change, and is my top priority as soon as I get unburied
- SP-GiST is unsafe for use by hot standby slaves, since I think
queries returning wrong answers = bad
- http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1333124720-sup-6193@alvh.no-ip.org
I'm not sure we can commit to a timeline for beta until we know who is
taking care of each of those things.
-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-04-25 19:03:15 | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-25 18:48:08 | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? |