Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, aidan <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-02-29 19:30:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2jPQk-Fi4TFBbQDEib6QXt4yn6pW3ZE_aerzBWs9vDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Note that if we want such an utility to walk and transform pages, we
> probably need a marker in the catalogs somewhere so that pg_upgrade can
> make sure that it was done in all candidate tables -- which is something
> that we should get in 9.2 so that it can be used in 9.3.  Such a marker
> would also allow us get rid of HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OUT.

Getting rid of HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OUT would be really nice,
but I don't see why we need to squeeze anything into 9.2 for any of
this. pg_upgrade can certainly handle the addition of a new pg_class
column, and can arrange for in-place upgrades from pre-9.3 versions to
9.3 to set the flag to the appropriate value.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-02-29 19:33:06 Re: "make check" in src/test/isolation is unworkable
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-02-29 19:29:26 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2