Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, aidan <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-02-29 19:30:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Note that if we want such an utility to walk and transform pages, we
> probably need a marker in the catalogs somewhere so that pg_upgrade can
> make sure that it was done in all candidate tables -- which is something
> that we should get in 9.2 so that it can be used in 9.3.  Such a marker
> would also allow us get rid of HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OUT.

Getting rid of HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OUT would be really nice,
but I don't see why we need to squeeze anything into 9.2 for any of
this.  pg_upgrade can certainly handle the addition of a new pg_class
column, and can arrange for in-place upgrades from pre-9.3 versions to
9.3 to set the flag to the appropriate value.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-02-29 19:33:06
Subject: Re: "make check" in src/test/isolation is unworkable
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2012-02-29 19:29:26
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group