Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Database designer

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Luis Ochoa <ziul1979(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database designer
Date: 2012-03-06 09:14:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 09:32 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mar 6, 2012 9:23 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> > <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On such a huge patch, it's really hard to work without commiting
>> some
>> > > parts of it. So I decided to commit each milestone of the project.
>> I
>> > > agree with you that it lacks lots of tweaking, but it's not that
>> bad.
>> >
>> > There are numerous basic issues (such as dialog design, and even
>> > labelling text) which most certainly should have been resolved prior
>> > to commit - they are a matter of maintaining basic standards - and
>> > that's not to mention that it's more or less impossible to use as
>> > designed on at least Mac. To quote a French friend of mine from June
>> > last year: "And without usability, it can't be commited in the
>> pgadmin
>> > repository."
>> Meh, who cares about mac? ;)
>> On a serious note, perhaps this patch was/is big enough that it
>> would've warranted an actual development branch in the main repo to
>> allow for easier testing and merging by more people while it
>> progresses? It won't magically solve any problems of course, but it
>> might be worth reconsidering the "branching policy" now that we've
>> used git for a while and people are more used to it?
> I would be fine with it if we had people to actually test it. But we
> don't. Dave's complaining now but the feature is in since early
> september 2011, meaning he didn't test it before.

Right - but I said at the time I didn't have the cycles to do any
testing, and you said you were going to test on Mac, which I said I
was happy with.

Dave Page
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2012-03-06 20:47:23
Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Make sure that queries use LIKE with _ escaped
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2012-03-06 09:12:53
Subject: Re: Database designer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group