Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

Hi Alvaro,

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:58 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2022-Mar-20, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 5:13 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > > On 2022-Mar-18, Zhihong Yu wrote:
>
> > > > + if (!partRel->rd_rel->relispartition)
> > > > + elog(ERROR, "cannot find ancestors of a non-partition result
> > > > relation");
> > > >
> > > > It would be better to include the relation name in the error message.
> > >
> > > I don't think it matters. We don't really expect to hit this.
> >
> > I tend to think maybe showing at least the OID in the error message
> > doesn't hurt, but maybe we don't need to.
>
> Since we don't even know of a situation in which this error message
> would be raised, I'm hardly bothered by failing to print the OID. If
> any users complain, we can add more detail.

Sure.

> I lament the fact that this fix is not going to hit Postgres 12-14, but
> ratio of effort to reward seems a bit too high. I think we could
> backpatch the two involved commits if someone is motivated enough to
> verify everything and come up with solutions for the necessary ABI
> changes.
>
> Thank you, Amit, for your perseverance in getting this bug fixed!

Thanks a lot for taking the time to review and commit.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com