| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better |
| Date: | 2021-03-03 14:39:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHKomeNCFXBRfWw3qyFjeEBxtszFj3tGG6GR3q=bezMBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just noticed that a test added by the recent 927f453a941 fails due to
0002. We no longer allow moving a row into a postgres_fdw partition
if it is among the UPDATE's result relations, whereas previously we
would if the UPDATE on that partition is already finished.
To fix, I've adjusted the test case. Attached updated version.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v10-0001-Overhaul-how-updates-compute-new-tuple.patch | application/octet-stream | 76.7 KB |
| v10-0002-Revise-how-inherited-update-delete-are-handled.patch | application/octet-stream | 204.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2021-03-03 14:43:16 | Re: "has_column_privilege()" issue with attnums and non-existent columns |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-03-03 14:33:05 | Re: contrib/cube - binary input/output handlers |