Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Date: 2020-03-02 05:08:41
Message-ID: CA+HiwqH1XMX9S7eUaOefz2BKJHaYnHnKyP2McG5MORcX=YHNiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Rebased again.
>
> Seems to need that again, according to cfbot :-(

Thank you, done.

Regards,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0002-Remove-es_result_relation_info.patch application/octet-stream 38.3 KB
v10-0003-Rearrange-partition-update-row-movement-code-a-b.patch application/octet-stream 16.0 KB
v10-0004-Refactor-transition-tuple-capture-code-a-bit.patch application/octet-stream 20.5 KB
v10-0001-Remove-dependency-on-estate-es_result_relation_i.patch application/octet-stream 12.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-03-02 05:28:41 effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-02 04:53:08 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line