| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David Rowley *EXTERN*" <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
| Date: | 2022-04-05 02:29:49 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGsVhUgqWDQwAs_WiOda33i7sgdno0ZAC4BwEfy59vYAA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:55 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 8:33 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I think the names ExecCreatePartitionPruneState and
> > ExecInitPartitionPruning are too confusingly similar. Maybe the former
> > should be renamed to somehow make it clear that it is a subroutine for
> > the former.
>
> Ah, yes. I've taken out the "Exec" from the former.
While at it, maybe it's better to rename ExecInitPruningContext() to
InitPartitionPruneContext(), which I've done in the attached updated
patch.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v10-0001-Some-refactoring-of-runtime-pruning-code.patch | application/octet-stream | 32.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-04-05 02:32:13 | Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-04-05 02:24:22 | Re: Lowering the ever-growing heap->pd_lower |