Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Date: 2019-09-26 04:56:37
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGXSE5772PqYTtQa_mSf-h5xCz4vf-Aq4wLuTQtLCe6ZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:45 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> To avoid losing track of this, I've added this to November CF.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/25/2277/
>
> Struggled a bit to give a title to the entry though.

Noticed that one of the patches needed a rebase.

Attached updated patches. Note that v8-0001 is v7-0001 unchanged that
Fujita-san posted on Aug 8.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Remove-dependency-on-estate-es_result_relation_in.patch application/octet-stream 12.0 KB
v8-0004-Refactor-transition-tuple-capture-code-a-bit.patch application/octet-stream 20.6 KB
v8-0002-Remove-es_result_relation_info.patch application/octet-stream 37.9 KB
v8-0003-Rearrange-partition-update-row-movement-code-a-bi.patch application/octet-stream 16.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Soumyadeep Chakraborty 2019-09-26 05:11:51 Re: Don't codegen deform code for virtual tuples in expr eval for scan fetch
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-26 04:53:14 Re: PostgreSQL12 and older versions of OpenSSL