Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions)

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions)
Date: 2022-11-16 02:35:08
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGTCc_4p3XTjaYPGkCEehaC7Xi48Aq-5ZYg-d11GHzd7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 3:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> + * The new member is identified by the zero-based index of the List
> >> + * element it should go into, and the bit number to be set therein.
>
> > The comment sounds a bit ambiguous, especially the ", and the bit
> > number to be set therein." part. If you meant to describe the
> > arguments, how about mentioning their names too, as in:
>
> Done that way in the patch I just posted.

Thanks.

> >> + /* forboth will stop at the end of the shorter list, which is fine */
>
> > Isn't this comment unnecessary given that the while loop makes both
> > lists be the same length?
>
> No, the while loop ensures that a is at least as long as b.
> It could have started out longer, though.

Oops, I missed that case.

The latest version looks pretty good to me.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2022-11-16 02:35:37 Re: closing file in adjust_data_dir
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-11-16 02:22:19 Re: Documentation for building with meson