Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2023-12-07 12:07:59
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFKhM=6fN3Np61uYGCsOGdBKk1K1MbCQ0Q6LMNWGShQ0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 7:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2023-Dec-07, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> > Hm, this set doesn't apply for me. 0003 gives error, see below (sorrty for
> > my interspersed bash echoing - seemed best to leave it in.
> > (I'm using patch; should be all right, no? Am I doing it wrong?)
>
> There's definitely something wrong with the patch file; that binary file
> should not be there. OTOH clearly if we ever start including binary
> files in our tree, `patch` is no longer going to cut it. Maybe we won't
> ever do that, though.
>
> There's also a complaint about whitespace.

Looks like I messed something up when using git (rebase -i). :-(

Apply-able patches attached, including fixes based on jian he's comments.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v30-0002-Add-soft-error-handling-to-populate_record_field.patch application/octet-stream 24.0 KB
v30-0001-Add-soft-error-handling-to-some-expression-nodes.patch application/octet-stream 9.5 KB
v30-0005-JSON_TABLE-don-t-assign-precedence-to-NESTED-PAT.patch application/octet-stream 4.7 KB
v30-0004-JSON_TABLE.patch application/octet-stream 176.2 KB
v30-0003-SQL-JSON-query-functions.patch application/octet-stream 195.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-12-07 12:09:07 Re: Reducing output size of nodeToString
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-12-07 11:59:55 Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?