Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed

From: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Francois Deliege <fdeliege(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed
Date: 2012-07-02 15:22:15
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm not sure that it's worth including this, considering the use
>> case...
> Since nobody seems crazy about pursuing this, I'm marking this patch Rejected.

Thank you, for considering this and many thanks to Etsuro Fujita for reviewing.

Ants Aasma
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Nils GorollDate: 2012-07-02 15:26:05
Subject: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-02 15:19:39
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make walsender more responsive.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group