| From: | Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Willy-Bas Loos <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-cluster-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server |
| Date: | 2012-06-27 12:58:22 |
| Message-ID: | CA+CSw_sryMFRS45ptRq4TYNCREgDKpSS+cyh-f_s-VpiYOLwBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cluster-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Jun 27, 2012 2:29 PM, "Willy-Bas Loos" <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Should i use a larger shared_buffers for the other cluster(s) too, so
that i bypass the inefficient OS file-cache?
Once the in-memory cluster has filled its shared buffers, the pages go cold
for the OS cache and get replaced with pages of other clusters that are
actually referenced.
Ants Aasma
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2012-06-27 13:23:58 | Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server |
| Previous Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2012-06-27 11:58:06 | Re: [performance] fast reads on a busy server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2012-06-27 13:23:58 | Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server |
| Previous Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2012-06-27 11:58:06 | Re: [performance] fast reads on a busy server |