Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: wenjing <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: wenjing <wenjing(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2021-12-21 03:04:06
Message-ID: CA+B_3VmNu+OCMphU+Vt-c81uhugejmmAs9OpOcwrJcwCyeTKwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Send an email to trigger the regress test.

wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2021年12月20日周一 20:42写道:

> Post GTT v63 to fixed conflicts with the latest code.
>
>
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Have you found any new bugs recently?
>
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
>
> 2021年11月20日 01:31,wenjing <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com> 写道:
>
>
>
> Andrew Bille <andrewbille(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2021年11月15日周一 下午6:34写道:
>
>> Thanks for the patches. The feature has become much more stable.
>> However, there is another simple case that generates an error:
>> Master with v61 patches
>>
>> CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE t AS SELECT 1 AS a;
>> ERROR: could not open file "base/13560/t3_16384": No such file or
>> directory
>>
> Thank you for pointing out that this part is not reasonable enough.
> This issue has been fixed in v62.
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
>
> Wenjing
>
>
>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:15 PM wenjing <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Fixed a bug in function pg_gtt_attached_pid.
>>> Looking forward to your reply.
>>>
>>>
>>> Wenjing
>>>
>>>
>
>
> <0001-gtt-v62-reademe.patch><0004-gtt-v62-regress.patch>
> <0002-gtt-v62-doc.patch><0003-gtt-v62-implementation.patch>
>
>
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-gtt-v63-doc.patch application/octet-stream 7.5 KB
0001-gtt-v63-reademe.patch application/octet-stream 7.5 KB
0004-gtt-v63-regress.patch application/octet-stream 82.9 KB
0003-gtt-v63-implementation.patch application/octet-stream 172.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-12-21 03:05:27 Re: parallel vacuum comments
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-12-21 02:49:33 Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication